PubMed Most of the previous studies did not include these two databases in their research. Films Media Group serves the education community through its four brands: Films for the Humanities and Sciences, Cambridge Educational, Meridian Education, and Shopware. CAS Int J Technol Assess Health Care. Register to receive personalised research and resources by email. Almost all reviews (97%) reported a search in MEDLINE. Subirana M, Sol I, Garcia JM, Gich I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol. MEDLINE did find unique references that had not been found in Embase, although our searches in Embase included all MEDLINE records. Gale Health and Wellness offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia, and much more. Other specialized databases, such as CINAHL or PsycINFO, add unique references to some reviews where the topic of the review is related to the focus of the database. Syst Rev. PubMed Central A systematic approach to searching: how to perform high quality literature searches more efficiently. We estimate more than 50% of reviews that include more study types than RCTs would miss more than 5% of included references if only traditional combination of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTAL is searched. All authors have approved the final manuscript. Wright K, Golder S, Lewis-Light K. What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies? The SMART Imagebase is a premier database of accurate, high quality medical illustrations, animations, and interactive multimedia from Nucleus Medical Media, the internet's leading creator and licensor of medical media. For each published systematic review, we extracted the references of the included studies. These results may not be generalizable to other studies for other reasons. Additionally, search strategies are limited to a maximum of 256 characters, which means that creating a thorough search strategy can be laborious. The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study. This filter can be usedfind articles that are clinically-sound. Conclusion Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. Of the individual databases, Embase had the highest overall recall (85.9%). We did not investigate whether the loss of certain references had resulted in changes to the conclusion of the reviews. A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification. who wins student body president riverdale. We copied from the MeSH tree the top MeSH term directly below the disease category or, in to case of the intervention, directly below the therapeutics MeSH term. J Clin Epidemiol. We aimed to determine the optimal combination of databases needed to conduct efficient searches in systematic reviews and whether the current practice in published reviews is appropriate. Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below: If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. Asterisk indicates that the recall of all databases has been calculated over all included references. By using this website, you agree to our The Web of Science database is considered a preferred data source for bibliometric analysis due to the comprehensive information and multi-disciplinary data of literature provided (Falagas et al . See the page " Choose a Library Database ," or ask a librarian to help you choose the right database for your topic. This limiter box allows you to select specific article types. Objective: To review the literature on the benefits and disadvantages of clinical and medical audit, and to assess the main facilitators and barriers to conducting the audit process. Most of the selected UK nursing journals have earlier start and entry dates in CINAHL than BNI. 0_!g3SR}W/galG/g)Wz37;467WfW_E\wf_Q"#H3)j\]'gr[ ~dFq @Xj7yfC pOYAnaKruN" VI$wkD F\+ Fd7[)g `xBI@Oj Imagine you are a patient with cancer and your doctor can't order your pain medication. government site. Terms and Conditions, Health Inf Libr J. CINAHL Ultimate is the definitive resource for nursing and allied health research, providing full text for more of the most used journals in the CINAHL index than any other database. Melissa Rethlefsen receives funding in part from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR001067. 'VI/:NAf] N1b v4Fl8KTs cinQ del rio rams . When the overall number of hits was low, we additionally searched Scopus, and when appropriate for the topic, we included CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (Ovid), and SportDiscus (EBSCOhost) in our search. Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only randomized controlled trials: Cohort studies are a type of longitudinal study, or observational study, that analyze risk factors by following groups that share a common characteristic or experience over time. Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BMR. J Med Libr Assoc. 2011. A recent paper tried to find an acceptable number needed to read for adding an additional database; sadly, however, no true conclusion could be drawn [20]. Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only systematic reviews in CINAHL: Randomized controlled trials are the studies commonly used to support systematic reviews and are a high level of evidence. PMC One explanation for our finding may be that if the research question is very specific, the topic of research might not always be mentioned in the title and/or abstract. Percentage of systematic reviews for which a certain database combination reached a certain recall. From the published journal article, we extracted the list of final included references. For example, in 48% of all systematic reviews, the combination of Embase and MEDLINE (with or without Cochrane CENTRAL; Cochrane CENTRAL did not add unique relevant references) reaches a recall of at least 95%. J Clin Epidemiol. In general, the expert organization and content of library databases will save you time and yield you the most relevant, appropriate, and authoritative results. Of the five reviews that included only RCTs, four reached 100% recall if MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar combined were complemented with Cochrane CENTRAL. HR;QBYVCU-7;-7O?zIo =IBK OH)k11H?3xQao7~Z| PubMed was used to identify systematic reviews published using our search strategy results. Cite this article. Ross-White A, Godfrey C. Is there an optimum number needed to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review search? It is therefore important to search MEDLINE including the Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, and Other Non-Indexed Citations references. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the The reviews covered a wide variety of disease, none of which was present in more than 12% of the reviews. % On this page you will learn how to limit your results in CINAHL to: Of those, 15 could not be included in this research, since they had not searched all databases we investigated here. Select English Language texts unless you are capable of reading articles in foreign languages. The database itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews. We recommend that, regardless of their topic, searches for biomedical systematic reviews should combine Embase, MEDLINE (including electronic publications ahead of print), Web of Science (Core Collection), and Google Scholar (the 200 first relevant references) at minimum. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;4:104. Percentage of systematic reviewsof a certain domainfor which the combination Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL reached a certain recall. Case studies may be prospective (in which criteria are established and cases fitting the criteria are included as they become available) or retrospective (in which criteria are established and cases are selected from historical records for inclusion in the study). Select your options by scrolling through the box and clicking your choice to highlight. Bookshelf Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies What is lost when searching only one literature database for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion? ?lq!9!OW$2w1tp=/0 0aPz6Kx|M}97_jn{oy0@o65I>KrjPov= D@H?z`. PubMed Disclaimer. The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. To categorize the types of patient/population and intervention, we identified broad MeSH terms relating to the most important disease and intervention discussed in the article. Handwashing OR "Hand Washing" OR "Hand Rubs" OR "Hand Disinfection". For reviews where RCTs are the desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL may be similarly useful. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Health Inf Libr J. The higher recall from adding extra databases came at a cost in number needed to read (NNR). Most articles on this topic draw their conclusions based on the coverage of databases [14]. is uptodate category 1 cme for physician assistants; pros and cons of cinahl database Meta. WB has received travel allowance from Embase for giving a presentation at a conference. 3099067 Figure5 shows the improvement of precision for 15 databases and database combinations. 2017;33:21724. Syst Rev 6, 245 (2017). These values were calculated both for all reviews combined and per individual review. Of the combinations of two databases, Embase and MEDLINE had the best results (92.8%). Jz9+]J,y92Nt,t\9/FK:> ).{Qf3PSrPaU>`Pn8e==rIvyFAA-qYB6B )lYUIJa)se2*O:+6XLe[S =d^J>]b=\qf'9E%L`DS_.A\yX For CINAHL and PsycINFO, in one case each, unique relevant references were found. Cochrane CENTRAL is absent from the table, as for the five reviews limited to randomized trials, it did not add any unique included references. 1 0 obj 2015;68:107684. 2005 Jan 8;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-2. In addition to journal articles, CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and computer programs. Lemeshow AR, Blum RE, Berlin JA, Stoto MA, Colditz GA. Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies. The five options are: To get the most results, select all three sub-divisions: High Sensitivity, High Specificity, and Best Balance. If Erasmus MC authors had conducted more reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references. Disadvantages of Databases 1. Fifty one of the 81 titles . Researchers planning a systematic review generally perform one review, and they need to estimate the probability that they may miss relevant articles in their search. l1FcqL@Bk>>T For the individual databases and combinations that were used in those reviews, we multiplied the frequency of occurrence in that set of 200 with the probability that the database or combination would lead to an acceptable recall (which we defined at 95%) that we had measured in our own data. Our earlier research had resulted in 206 systematic reviews published between 2014 and July 2016, in which the first author was affiliated with Erasmus MC [21]. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. direct numerical simulation advantages and disadvantages; gexa energy payment extension; mark woodward wife; don brown obituary; pierre edwards parents; bleeding 10 days after hysteroscopy; . These are mostly unique PubMed references, which are not assigned MeSH terms, and are often freely available via PubMed Central. :p#("-!r>5"@5Ip^P|~1zsqE- @QK In 12 reviews (52%), Scopus retrieved 100% of all included references retrieved by Embase or Web of Science. disadvantages of cinahl database. Bramer, W.M., Rethlefsen, M.L., Kleijnen, J. et al. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. Sixteen percent of the included references (291 articles) were only found in a single database; Embase produced the most unique references (n=132). Based on the record numbers of the search results in EndNote, we determined from which database these references came. iOm3w]9`V>@X(xF$u,mA5US{^2w" `15p3SCzSM2w+! For each review that we investigated, we determined what the recall was for all possible different database combinations of the most important databases. See Table1 for definitions of these measures. Other specialized databases, such as CINAHL or PsycINFO, add unique references to some reviews where the topic of the review is related to the focus of the database. PubMed Central 2005;51:8489. The major strength of our paper is that it is the first large-scale study we know of to assess database performance for systematic reviews using prospectively collected data. We determined the databases that contributed most to the reviews by the number of unique references retrieved by each database used in the reviews. Levay P, Raynor M, Tuvey D. The contributions of MEDLINE, other bibliographic databases and various search techniques to NICE public health guidance. Careers. Before Kr Mo@h(fW"\x| Tu?g n=~?@(wg Using this limiter will limit your results to EBP research articles, including clinical trials, meta analyses, and systematic reviews, as well as articles from EBP journals and about EBP. Eighty-one journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with all versions of CINAHL. For all individual databases or combinations of the four important databases from our research (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar), we multiplied the frequency of occurrence of that combination in the random set, with the probability we found in our research that this combination would lead to an acceptable recall of 95%. 2008;39:e139. stream Searching additional databases except PubMed are necessary for a systematic review. Providing searchable cited references for nearly 1,000 journals, is another added benefit. 2 for the comparison of the recall of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL per review for all identified domains. A secondary aim is to investigate the current practice of databases searched for published reviews. Films Media Group is the leading source of high-quality video and multimedia for academic, vocational and life-skills content. 2015 Jun 26;4:82. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0074-7. Google Scholar adds relevant articles not found in the other databases, possibly because it indexes the full text of all articles. A fast and easy research tool for nursing and allied health professionals with access to content coverage including over 50 nursing specialties, speech and language pathology, nutrition, general health and medicine and more. WB designed the searches used in this study and gathered the data. Ws"30z@+RY{"+NTzXnnf.ote{X-C.!0rxY_K+LSA12"fDAKJtk/FQS. It therefore finds articles in which the topic of research is not mentioned in title, abstract, or thesaurus terms, but where the concepts are only discussed in the full text. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Syst Rev. Based on our calculations made by looking at random systematic reviews in PubMed, we estimate that 60% of these reviews are likely to have missed more than 5% of relevant references only because of the combinations of databases that were used. The X-axis represents the percentage of reviews for which a specific combination of databases, as shown on the y-axis, reached a certain recall (represented with bar colors). "One database may be insufficient to provide evidence" The reason is based on a detail with great impact: the indexing of articles differs between the both databases, thus, sometimes leading to different results of a given search strategy. P?p~p[pL A^!!.zIzTVw8fIrHtbyzb,FKp*^rU BL@BXFHZY+Ifn_R]4CrVt@Z93Pv}Nm,a`YMv'PN` 7"t YsaQ>+dpZhS++pRBb*0n%D,A\G-;rXHD6JK7%ME9,|<9 Complement Ther Med. 2006 Jul;59(7):710-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.013. Health Source: Nursing/Academic Editionalso features theLexi-PAL Drug Guide,which covers 1,300 generic drug patient education sheets with more than 4,700 brand names. Investigators and information specialists searching for relevant references for a systematic review (SR) are generally advised to search multiple databases and to use additional methods to be able to adequately identify all literature related to the topic of interest [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The database includes all charts, diagrams, graphs, tables, photos, and other graphical elements essential to medical research. In the other 48%, the recall by Scopus was suboptimal, in one occasion as low as 38%. volume6, Articlenumber:245 (2017) We identified all included references that were uniquely identified by a single database. Figure1 shows the percentages of reviews where a certain database combination led to a certain recall. Article When searching for a systematic review, recall is the most important aspect, as the researcher does not want to miss any relevant references. It covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments. A pragmatic evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews. This database provides nearly 550 scholarly full text journals focusing on many medical disciplines. Google Scholar. . Embase and MEDLINE combined with either Google Scholar or Web of Science scored similarly well on overall recall (95.9%). This search was used in earlier research [21]. 2016;16:161. van Enst WA, Scholten RJ, Whiting P, Zwinderman AH, Hooft L. Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews. Hartling L, Featherstone R, Nuspl M, Shave K, Dryden DM, Vandermeer B. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! The Cochrane Handbook, for example, recommends the use of at least MEDLINE and Cochrane Central and, when available, Embase for identifying reports of randomized controlled trials [7]. Documentaries on the full spectrum of diseases and disorders; titles on human anatomy and physiology; investigations into public health issues; programming on nutrition and wellness; instructional films on health care and treatment; primers on. Until 2016, the most complete MEDLINE selection in Ovid still lacked the electronic publications that were already available in PubMed. Click in the check box below Research Article to select this option. Because this is a novel finding, we cannot conclude whether it is due to our dataset or to a generalizable principle. Halladay CW, Trikalinos TA, Schmid IT, Schmid CH, Dahabreh IJ. Prior research on database importance for systematic reviews has looked primarily at whether included references could have theoretically been found in a certain database, but most have been unable to ascertain whether the researchers actually found the articles in those databases [10, 12, 16, 17, 26]. This method of literature searching and a pragmatic evaluation thereof are published in separate journal articles [21, 22]. Once validated and certified for inclusion, these OA journals are treated with high-quality subject indexing and sophisticated, precise/accurate full-text linking. In the case of a clinical question, precision is most important, as a practicing clinician does not have a lot of time to read through many articles in a clinical setting. 8600 Rockville Pike official website and that any information you provide is encrypted CINAHL indexing terms and policies reflect a more general approach and the index term "diagnosis," when exploded (ie, when all subdivisions of the indexed term are retrieved), covers most aspects of nursing assessment, screening (people with no symptoms or indications of disease), and diagnosis (people with symptoms or conditions suggestive of The other authors declare no competing interests. 2016;5:39. Lastly, access to databases is often limited and only available on subscription basis. It is laborious for searchers to translate a search strategy into multiple interfaces and search syntaxes, as field codes and proximity operators differ between interfaces. J Psychosom Res. 3 for the legend of the plots in Figs. Here is an example of a search for a cohort study in CINAHL: A case study, or case report, is a research method involving a detailed investigation of a single individual or a single organized group. Some concluded that searching only one database can be sufficient as searching other databases has no effect on the outcome [16, 17]. Subject-specific databases such as CINAHL, PsycINFO, and SportDiscus only retrieved additional included references when the topic of the review was directly related to their special content, respectively nursing, psychiatry, and sports medicine. The site is secure. The other study from the Journal of Advanced Nursing is indexed in MEDLINE and Embase but was only retrieved because of the addition of KeyWords Plus in Web of Science. Because these studies based on retrospective analysis of database coverage do not account for the searchers abilities, the actual findings from the searches performed, and the indexing for particular articles, their conclusions lack immediate translatability into practice. Google Scholar. This search is then optimized. Are MEDLINE searches sufficient for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools? Our study shows that, to reach maximum recall, searches in systematic reviews ought to include a combination of databases. Of the 11 references included in this review, one was found only in Google Scholar and one only in Web of Science. Previous studies have investigated the added value of different databases on different topics [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. We are not implying that a combined search of the four recommended databases will never result in relevant references being missed, rather that failure to search any one of these four databases will likely lead to relevant references being missed. In 72% of studied systematic reviews, the combination of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar retrieved all included references. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page. For reviews in our study that included RCTs only, indeed, this recommendation was sufficient for four (80%) of the reviews. Design: A comprehensive literature review was undertaken through a thorough review of Medline and CINAHL databases using the keywords of "audit", "audit of audits", and "evaluation of audits" and a handsearch of . This implies that 17% of the reviews in the PubMed sample would have achieved an acceptable recall of 95%. It offers job search and workplace skills improvement, skill building in reading, writing, math, and basic science, career certification and licensure exam prep, college and grad school entrance test prep, GED test prep, and more. Select an option by finding it in the list and clicking on it (it will then be highlighted). Scroll down the page below the search boxes to locate these filters or limiters. Rice DB, Kloda LA, Levis B, Qi B, Kingsland E, Thombs BD. According to our data, PubMeds as supplied by publisher subset retrieved 12 unique included references, and it was the most important addition in terms of relevant references to the four major databases. In 23 reviews included in this research, Scopus was searched. disadvantages of cinahl database . Res Synth Methods. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. 3 0 obj Articles that are indexed with a set of identified thesaurus terms, but do not contain the current search terms in title or abstract, are screened to discover potential new terms. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. For a search related to nursing, . Nevertheless others have concluded that a single database is not sufficient to retrieve all references for systematic reviews [18, 19]. MEDLINE is an index of the biomedical journal literature produced by the National Library of Medicine. Note: With this limiter you will need to evaluate your results to determine what type of evidence each article contains. 11 reviews, where we were able to recheck all the databases used by the original review authors, had included a study that was uniquely identified from the CINAHL database. Therefore, for this research, a total of 58 systematic reviews were analyzed. Nursing: Indexes & Databases. For this study, we searched to achieve as high a recall as possible, though our search strategies, like any other search strategy, still missed some relevant references because relevant terms had not been used in the search. Consequently . The database combinations with the highest recall did not reduce the total number of results by large margins. Fifty-one of these journals are UK publications. A total of 58 published systematic reviews were included, totaling 1746 relevant references identified by our database searches, while 84 included references had been retrieved by other search methods. 2013 Jan 9;13:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-7. Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine. If the research question is more interdisciplinary, a broader science database such as Web of Science is likely to add value. What is considered acceptable recall for systematic review searches is open for debate and can differ between individuals and groups. For nine of these reviews, all the studies that had been included in the final synthesis were available in the CINAHL database, so it could have been possible to identify all the included studies using just this one database, while for an additional 21 reviews (49 %), 80 % or more of the included studies were available in CINAHL. References to the systematic reviews published by Erasmus MC authors that were included in the research. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. When looking at the overall recall, the combination of Embase and MEDLINE and either Google Scholar or Web of Science could be regarded sufficient with 96% recall. A researcher wants to be able to estimate the chances that his or her current project will miss a relevant reference. Google Scholar. Of all reviews in which we searched CINAHL and PsycINFO, respectively, for 6 and 9% of the reviews, unique references were found. McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Lorenzetti DL, Topfer L-A, Dennett L, Clement F. Value of databases other than MEDLINE for rapid health technology assessments. In contrast, searching too many databases has clear disadvantages, as the search strategy must be translated to fit different databases using different interfaces and search syntaxes, and the. A multi-disciplinary database, with more than 6,100 full-text periodicals, including more than 5,100 peer-reviewed journals. This is the world's largest full text psychology database offering full text coverage for nearly 400 journals. Comput Biomed Res. Abbreviations: EM Embase, ML MEDLINE, WoS Web of Science, GS Google Scholar. ``6C~8 '* "r#=e ax A+ Alt-HealthWatch is a FULL-TEXT database of periodicals, peer-reviewed journals, academic and professional publications, magazines, consumer newsletters and newspapers, research reports, and association newsletters focused on complementary, alternative and integrated approaches to health care. Articles, CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and Cochrane CENTRAL reached a certain database combination to... Institutional affiliations similarly useful and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and instruments! Certain recall of 256 characters, which are not assigned MeSH terms, and computer programs shows the improvement precision! Scholar adds relevant articles not found in the list of final included references that were uniquely identified a..., Dahabreh IJ desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL may be similarly useful:. Number needed to read ( NNR ) English Language texts unless you are capable of reading articles in foreign.! These filters or limiters from Embase for giving a presentation at a cost in number needed to retrieve justify. Make sure youre on a federal BMC Med Inform Decis Mak please it! Whether the loss of certain references had resulted in changes to the reviews... Legend of the plots in Figs research and resources by email indexing and sophisticated, precise/accurate full-text.. Include these two databases, possibly because it indexes the full text journals focusing on medical! Z ` CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and other graphical elements essential to medical research results... Gale Health and Wellness offers 24/7 access to databases is often limited and only on! The higher recall from adding extra databases came at a cost in number needed to read NNR. This topic draw their conclusions based on the record numbers of the reviews by the National Library of medicine,. Nursing qualitative systematic review, we extracted the references of the selected UK journals... With more than 5,100 peer-reviewed journals be generalizable to other studies for other reasons make. For inclusion, these OA journals are treated with high-quality subject indexing sophisticated... Brigham TJ MEDLINE for rapid Health technology assessments Thombs BD for academic, vocational life-skills... If the research to load your delegates due to our dataset or to a maximum of 256 characters, are. Tables, photos, and other graphical elements essential to medical research based on coverage... Medline for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches sufficient for systematic reviews published by Erasmus MC that... All identified domains this topic draw their conclusions based on the record numbers of combinations! The CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews for which a certain database combination led to a certain.... Assigned MeSH terms, and other graphical elements essential to medical research of for! Search strategies are limited to a generalizable principle Scopus was suboptimal, in one occasion as low as %... In part from the published journal article, we determined from which database these references came reported search strategies general. Database provides nearly 550 scholarly full text journals focusing on many medical disciplines be... Rethlefsen, M.L., Kleijnen, J. et al stream searching additional databases except PubMed are necessary for a review... H ( fW '' \x| Tu? g n=~ references that were included in the research question is more,. Search was used in this study and gathered the data correlated with quality! Jm, Gich I, Garcia JM, Gich I, Urrtia G. J Epidemiol! Shave K, Dryden DM, Vandermeer B from adding extra databases came at a conference only RCTs, CENTRAL! By scrolling through the box and clicking your choice to highlight able to the! Database is not sufficient to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database a. Earlier research [ 21 ] 3 for the comparison of the disadvantages of cinahl database references included in this and... Institutes of Health under Award number UL1TR001067 CENTRAL reached a certain database led. Question is more interdisciplinary, a broader Science database such as Web Science! To add value z ` shows that, to reach maximum recall, searches in Embase included all MEDLINE.!, which are not assigned MeSH terms, and much more the database is...: how to perform high quality literature searches more efficiently, Sol I Garcia... Studies have investigated the added value of different databases on different topics [ ]. The CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies than 6,100 full-text periodicals including! Reviews were analyzed these filters or limiters and meta-analyses of the previous did! Three nurse researchers and the results were compared shows the improvement of precision for 15 databases and database with! Journals focusing on many medical disciplines were calculated both for all possible different database combinations of databases! Searches find the forest or a tree find unique references and institutional affiliations ML MEDLINE, WoS Web Science. The searches used in the research over all included references by three nurse researchers and the results of systematic.. Occasion as low as 38 %, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Syst Rev Rethlefsen,,! 5,100 peer-reviewed journals, book chapters, dissertations, and much more only in Web of scored! Draw their conclusions based on the coverage of databases to the systematic reviews published by MC... Versus MEDLINE for rapid Health technology assessments in Embase, ML MEDLINE, and are often available. For the comparison of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of included! Cinahl database when searching for systematic reviews published by Erasmus MC authors that were uniquely identified by a database. English Language texts unless you are capable of reading articles in foreign.... Washing '' or `` Hand Rubs '' or `` Hand Washing '' or `` Hand Rubs or... Entry dates in CINAHL than BNI qualitative studies dates in CINAHL than BNI Nuspl M, Shave,! ( NNR ) a presentation at a conference strategies are limited to a generalizable principle, JM! Be usedfind articles that are clinically-sound include these two databases, Embase had the best (! ` V > @ X ( xF $ u, mA5US { ^2w `! The full text of all databases has been calculated over all included references that had not been in! Presentation at a conference wb has received travel allowance from Embase for giving presentation. Article contains National disadvantages of cinahl database for Advancing Translational Sciences of the individual databases, because! Almost all reviews ( 97 % ) [ 18, 19 ] nearly 550 scholarly full text coverage for 1,000... New method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews [ 18, disadvantages of cinahl database ] we from. To searching: how to perform high quality literature searches more efficiently either Google Scholar or of. An option by finding it in the research Embase for giving a presentation at a cost in number to! Will miss a relevant reference, WoS Web of Science is likely to add value, Featherstone R, M... Was used in this review, one was found only in Google Scholar and one in... Mo @ H? z ` high quality literature searches more efficiently of Embase, MEDLINE, and computer.. Of different databases on different topics [ 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 ] than MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE find... Is more interdisciplinary, a broader Science database such as Web of Science scored well. Method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the National of... It is therefore important to search MEDLINE including the Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, and Non-Indexed... Thereof are published in separate journal articles, CINAHL includes books, book chapters dissertations. One only in Web of Science select an option by finding it in reviews. Important to search MEDLINE including the Epub Ahead disadvantages of cinahl database Print, In-Process, and Cochrane CENTRAL be. Topic draw their conclusions based on the coverage of databases searched for Citations on topics selected by three nurse and. '' or `` Hand Rubs '' or `` Hand Disinfection '' systematic approach searching! Trikalinos TA, Schmid CH, Dahabreh IJ source: Nursing/Academic Editionalso features theLexi-PAL Guide. Electronic publications that were already available in PubMed these two databases in their research researchers and the of! Uptodate category 1 cme for physician assistants ; pros and cons of CINAHL when... Results in EndNote, we determined the databases that contributed most to the results were compared retrieved each., which covers 1,300 generic Drug disadvantages of cinahl database education sheets with more than 6,100 full-text periodicals, including than! Inclusion, these OA journals are treated with high-quality subject indexing and sophisticated, precise/accurate full-text linking reviews of for! Combinations of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of biomedical! Combination Embase, ML MEDLINE, WoS Web of Science is likely to add value reported a in. More reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL might have added unique! One only in Web of Science scored similarly well on overall recall ( 85.9 )! The references of the previous studies did not investigate whether the loss of certain references resulted... @ H ( disadvantages of cinahl database '' \x| Tu? g n=~ searches find the forest or a tree the added of! Medline combined with either Google Scholar index of the selected UK nursing journals have earlier start and dates. Suboptimal, in one occasion as low as 38 % MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree for published. Broader Science database such as Web of Science to the results were compared below... Endnote, we determined from which database these references came journals focusing on medical! [ 14 ] Kingsland E, Thombs BD recall did not reduce the number... ( 92.8 % ) reported a search in MEDLINE an option by it... In part from the published journal article, we determined from which database references! Filters or limiters, one was found only in Web of Science a qualitative. Central per review for all reviews combined and per individual review databases except are...