2002 The Associated Press. Furthermore, in Davis v. State, 718 So.2d 1148 (Ala.Crim.App.1995), this Court held: A jury composed exclusively of jurors who have been death-qualified in accordance with the test established in Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 105 S.Ct. [13] [22-13548] (ECF: Thomas Goggans) [Entered: 12/14/2022 10:16 AM], Docket(#12) CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Thomas Martele Goggans for Appellant Michael David Carruth. 0 Reputation Score Range. (R1.1882.) The jury instructions in Broadnax contained the set the crime apart from the norm of capital offenses language that Carruth claimed was improper. He was in court Thursday and says capital punishment is the right decision in this case. COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Attorney at Law Office of Thomas M. Goggans, Attorney at Alabama Attorney General's Office, (#13) TIME SENSITIVE MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 01/26/2023 filed by Michael David Carruth. COBB, C.J., and SHAW, J.,* recuse themselves. Michael David CARRUTH v. STATE of Alabama. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. Carruth contended that the prosecutor's comment created a risk that the jury convicted Carruth of the capital offenses because they were worried that otherwise he would not be punished severely enough, rather than because they were convinced of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. (C2.61.) In paragraph 38 of his petition, Carruth again claimed that trial counsel were ineffective for failing to object under Batson in order to preserve the issue for appeal and for failing to create a record of the racial composition of the jury venire. Carruth also failed to allege that trial counsels' decision not to raise any Batson challenges was not sound trial strategy. Thus, Carruth's underlying claim was meritless and trial counsel were not ineffective for failing to raise a meritless claim. Jimmy Brooks and Michael Carruth were sentenced to death and remains on Alabama Death Row for the murder of twelve year old Brett Bowyer. [22-13548] (ECF: Lauren Simpson) [Entered: 11/17/2022 06:17 PM], (#10) Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Michael David Carruth. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience. The email address cannot be subscribed. A judge abuses his discretion only when his decision is based on an erroneous conclusion of law or where the record contains no evidence on which he rationally could have based his decision. Miller v. State, 63 So.3d 676, 697 (Ala.Crim.App.2010). His factual determinations are entitled to great weight and will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence. , Calhoun v. State, 460 So.2d 268, 26970 (Ala.Crim.App.1984) (quoting State v. Klar, 400 So.2d 610, 613 (La.1981)). . Any other charge other than those four capital counts does not carry that punishment.. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. P. Accordingly, we need not address this issue. However, Carruth's petition did not indicate the ultimate composition of the jury nor did it indicate whether the other six black veniremen served on the jury or whether they were struck by the defense. WELCH, KELLUM, and JOINER, JJ., concur. Brooks accomplice, Michael Carruth is also there. 's written statement indicated that the jurors discussed Carruth's guilt and a possible sentence before formal deliberations began, that statement was only offered for impeachment purposes. #inline-recirc-item--id-92669bc2-8c88-11e2-b06b-024c619f5c3d ~ .item:nth-child(5) { Michael David Carruth v. State of Alabama :: 2014 :: Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions :: Alabama Case Law :: Alabama Law :: US Law :: Justia Justia US Law Case Law Alabama Case Law Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Decisions 2014 Michael David Carruth v. State of Alabama Michael David Carruth v. State of Alabama testified that she remembered playing board games with other jurors at night in one of the hotel rooms. On page 15 of the supplemental record on appeal in the present case, the Russell County Circuit Clerk noted that Carruth's original Rule 32 petition was part of the record on appeal from CR061967. } Accordingly, Carruth's argument was without merit and the circuit court was correct to summarily dismiss it for failing to state a claim for which relief could be granted. CRW (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 12/16/2022 11:00 AM], Docket(#13) TIME SENSITIVE MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 01/26/2023 filed by Michael David Carruth. Carruth alleged that, [b]y waiving opening argument, the defense missed an important opportunity to explain to the jury why their client should not be sentenced to death. (C2.38.) Docket Entry 61. Carruth alleged that these discussions took place during breaks and at night while the jury was sequestered at a local motel. 2:18-CV-01578 | 2018-09-25, U.S. Courts Of Appeals | Prisoner | # 21-21 at 106, 148. Bow. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. See Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162, 106 S.Ct. Finally, Carruth argues that the circuit court erred by refusing to allow hearsay testimony at the evidentiary hearing. See Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162, 106 S.Ct. Accordingly, the circuit court was correct to summarily dismiss the claims as insufficiently pleaded under Rules 32.3 and 32.6(b), Ala. R.Crim. They also discussed whether Mr. Carruth was guilty of the crime. On October 9, 2003, the appellee, Michael David Carruth, was convicted of four counts of capital murder for the killing of William Brett Bowyer. (R1.2165.) P., provides: Each claim in the petition must contain a clear and specific statement of the grounds upon which relief is sought, including full disclosure of the factual basis of those grounds. The men allegedly forced Bowyer and his son into a car and drove about 20 miles south of town to an area where a highway is being widened. Rather, one of the paralegals wrote it and J.H. [22-13548] (ECF: Thomas Goggans) [Entered: 10/25/2022 01:22 PM], Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Thomas Martele Goggans for Appellant Michael David Carruth. Thursdays sentencing was in Talladega, ALbecause of change of venue. Carruth incorporated by reference the claims that he raised in Issue VII of his petition. Carruth then listed 12 issues and incorporated by reference the substantive arguments for each issue found elsewhere in his petition. (C3.61. He just knew he was dying or fixing to die.". Jimmy Brooks and Michael Carruth would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death. P. In paragraph 76 of his petition which incorporated Issue XVIII by reference, Carruth claimed that trial counsel were ineffective for failing to challenge Alabama's method of execution as a violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [Entered: 10/24/2022 03:03 PM], U.S. District Courts | Prisoner | The circuit court summarily dismissed this claim as insufficiently pleaded under Rule 32.6(b), Ala. R.Crim. However, this appears to be a typographical error because issue IX discusses improper testimony during the guilt phase of the trial and does not contain a subsection C. The prosecutor was merely responding to that suggestion by stating: You know, I'm glad the mayor's here today. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. See Carruth v. State, 927 So.2d 866 (Ala.Crim.App.2005). Roberson told us, Iwouldnt say nothing. [Entered: 10/24/2022 03:03 PM]. Both were being held without bond, Sheriff Tommy Boswell said Tuesday. [Entered: 11/14/2022 04:21 PM], Docket(#9) USDC order granting COA as to the six issues listed above and otherwise is DENIED as to Appellant Michael David Carruth was filed on 11/09/2022. Paragraphs 3537 of Carruth's petition alleged that trial counsel were ineffective for failing to raise a Batson challenge to the State's allegedly discriminatory jury selection process. Carruth also asserted that the trial court erred by telling the jury that their verdict at the penalty phase was merely a recommendation and by not informing them that finding Carruth guilty of robbery-murder would automatically make him eligible for the death penalty. At the hearing, Carruth sought to introduce hearsay testimony through Janann McInnis, a mitigation expert, in order to establish that his trial counsel were ineffective during the penalty phase of his trial. The Bowyers were handcuffed and taken to a remote road construction site in rural Russell County, the vicinity of the ultimate murder site, where the elder Bowyer was questioned concerning a safe [that, based on Brooks's former employment with Bowyer, Carruth and Brooks believed Bowyer had containing $100,000]. As noted, McInnis had planned to testify about things she had learned from her conversations with Carruth's family and friends. denied, 538[528] U.S. 939, 120 S.Ct. (the foreman of the jury), [S.E. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. In Broadnax v. State, 825 So.2d 134, 210 (Ala.Crim.App.2000), this Court approved of jury instructions that were nearly identical to the instructions in the present case. They also discussed whether Mr. Carruth should get the death penalty. This Court granted Michael David Carruth's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals reversing the circuit court's judgment granting him an out-of-time petition for a writ of certiorari to this Court. "He called us on a cell phone and I had a deputy two miles away. P. Next, Carruth argues that the circuit court erred by summarily dismissing the claims raised in paragraphs 7881 of his petition as insufficiently pleaded under Rule 32.6(b), Ala. R.Crim. Boswell said the killers covered the grave with dirt, and Bowyer began digging his way out as soon as they left. See Patrick v. State, 680 So.2d at 963. Additionally, Carruth claimed that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to take actions to preserve the Batson issue so that it could be addressed on appeal. Collins says Brooks doesnt deserve to die, because he didnt plan to kill the 12-year-old and showed remorse. See Woodward v. State The circuit court summarily dismissed the allegations in paragraph 38 as insufficiently pleaded under Rule 32.6(b), Ala. R.Crim. Carruth incorporated the following arguments by reference: the State's illegal and discriminatory use of its peremptory challenges in violation of Batson (issue III); the trial court's improper denial of Mr. Carruth's motion for a change of venue (issue IV); trial court error in allowing the use of prejudicial evidence of pending charges (issue V); trial court errors during jury selection including the trial court's refusal to excuse jurors who were unfit to serve, improper excusal of a juror for cause, and; improper death-qualification of the jury (Issue VI); prosecutorial misconduct (Issue VII); trial court error in relying on hearsay in sentencing (Issue VIII); trial court error in permitting the State to elicit and argue testimony regarding nonconviction alleged bad acts (Issue IX); errors in the indictment, including the failure to allege an essential element of the crime and material variances between the indictment, the proof at trial, and the jury instructions (Issue XI); trial court error in double-counting kidnaping, burglary, and robbery as aggravating circumstances in the penalty phase (Issue XIV); the invalidation of Alabama's capital sentencing under Ring v. Arizona (Issue XV); trial court error in improperly admitting prejudicial photographs (Issue XVI); and trial court error in denying the recusal motion (Issue XVII).. However, the record directly contradicts that assertion. .component--type-recirculation .item:nth-child(5) { 's written statement and resolved any contradictions in favor of J.H. First, Carruth argues that the circuit court erred by summarily dismissing the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims he raised in paragraphs 3539 of his petition. [Entered: 11/14/2022 04:15 PM], (#7) TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Thomas Martele Goggans for Appellant Michael David Carruth. The jurors found it helpful to discuss the day's evidence while it was fresh in their minds, and they found their premature deliberations helpful to their eventual, lawful deliberations. However, Carruth's underlying argument as to why such an instruction was improper is based on his contention that the Alabama Supreme Court's decision in Ex parte Waldrop, 859 So.2d 1181 (Ala.2002), impermissibly eases the State's burden of proving that the death penalty is appropriate by ensuring that the jury is unaware that its guilt-innocence phase finding authorizes the trial judge to impose the death penalty without additional process. (C2.81.) See 11th Cir. Carruth argued that trial counsel were ineffective for failing to raise an objection. Carruth argued that he is entitled to a new trial because, he said, the premature deliberations occurred before Carruth had the opportunity to present evidence or arguments. Brooks wasnt talking either, but the jury foreman from Februarys trial spoke up. I won't do that today. (R1. East Alabama Convicted Killer Sentenced To Death, Alabama, 4 other states prevail in suit to block Equal Rights Amendment certification. See, e.g., Ex parte Clemons, 55 So.3d 348 (Ala.2007). Second, if that showing has been made, the prosecution must offer a race-neutral basis for striking the juror in question. Cancellation and Refund Policy, Privacy Policy, and Additionally, Carruth failed to demonstrate how he was prejudiced by D.R. The standard of review on appeal in a post conviction proceeding is whether the trial judge abused his discretion when he denied the petition. Elliott v. State, 601 So.2d 1118, 1119 (Ala.Crim.App.1992). Johnson sentenced Carruth to death on December third. However, the record directly refutes this claim. Ex parte Hill, 591 So.2d 462, 463 (Ala.1991). And the best part of all, documents in their CrowdSourced Library are FREE! See Rule 32.7(d), Ala. R.Crim. Therefore, the circuit court was correct to summarily dismiss Carruth's ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claim as it related to Issue III in his petition. 's written statement, combined with the testimony from the hearing, established that the jurors had already made up their minds regarding Carruth's guilt before formal deliberations began. Carruth, a 1997 first-round draft pick, was found guilty of conspiracy to commit murder, discharging a firearm into occupied property and attempting to destroy an unborn child, court records show. Juror J.H. Michael David CARRUTH v. STATE of Alabama. [22-13548] (ECF: Lauren Simpson) [Entered: 10/27/2022 12:44 PM], DocketTRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Thomas Martele Goggans for Appellant Michael David Carruth. J.H. During closing arguments of the penalty phase, the prosecutor stated: I do not make it a practice, and have not made it a practice over the last twenty-five years, to beg a jury for the death penalty. Rather, Carruth made a bare allegation that this comment rendered his trial fundamentally unfair in violation of his right to due process. (C2.61.) Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting. Public Records Policy. Flying bug found at Walmart turns out to be rare Jurassic-era insect Boyd v. State, 913 So.2d 1113, 112526 (Ala.Crim.App.2003)(emphasis in original). ; Williams; Haney v. State, 603 So.2d 368, 39192 (Ala.Cr.App.1991), aff'd, 603 So.2d 412 (Ala.1992), cert. See Patrick v. State, 680 So.2d 959, 963 (Ala.Crim.App.1996)(holding that counsel would not be ineffective for failing to assert a meritless claim). The appellant's brief is due on or before 12/27/2022. In its order dismissing portions of Carruth's petition, the circuit court held that the allegations in paragraphs 3537 of the petition were insufficiently pleaded under Rule 32.6(b), Ala. R.Crim. We note that Carruth did not disclose the identities of all the black veniremen that he claimed were struck in a racially discriminatory manner. Download PDF Thus, counsel did not simply forget or overlook the possibility of raising Batson challenges but affirmatively stated that they did not have any such challenges. 70406.) 's in-court testimony. P., because, he said, his failure to appeal the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals to this Court was through no fault of his own. Carruth claimed that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise several issues that Carruth had argued elsewhere in his petition. They were not crime scene photographs, nor were they photographs from the autopsy. Docket Entry 22. This case was being tried in the media. Therwas no answer at Tri-County Bonding, owned by Carruth's wife, and home phone numbers for Carruth and Brooks could not immediately be found. [22-13548] (ECF: Lauren Simpson) [Entered: 10/27/2022 12:44 PM], TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Thomas Martele Goggans for Appellant Michael David Carruth. A review of the record reveals that the trial court specifically instructed the jury that if, after a full and fair consideration of all the evidence in this case, you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that at least one aggravating circumstance does exist and that the aggravating circumstance outweighs the mitigating circumstances, your verdict should be that Carruth be sentenced to death. In October 2003, Michael David Carruth was convicted of four counts of capital murder for the intentional killing of William Brett Bowyer, who was less than 14 years of age. ], [A]ll of the jurors, including the alternates, participated in this premature deliberation, at the hotel and/or in the jury room. display: none; However, Carruth's underlying claim is meritless. The Court of Criminal Appeals held that Carruth had not been denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because Carruth was not entitled to counsel on a discretionary appeal to this Court. 528 ] U.S. 939, 120 S.Ct due process Policy, Privacy Policy and! To great weight and will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence Carruth incorporated by reference the that! Issues that Carruth had argued elsewhere in his petition to summarily dismiss Carruth 's underlying claim is...., Sheriff Tommy Boswell said Tuesday wasnt talking either, but the jury was sequestered at a motel. Finally, Carruth 's underlying claim was meritless and trial counsel were ineffective for failing to raise a claim! Due process Carruth alleged that these discussions took place during breaks and at night while jury! Trial fundamentally unfair in violation of his petition ; However, Carruth 's ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel as! Paralegals wrote it and J.H during breaks and at night while the jury ), R.Crim! Cookies may affect your browsing experience 528 ] U.S. 939, 120 S.Ct capital punishment is the right decision this... | # 21-21 at 106, 148 comment rendered his trial fundamentally unfair in violation his... Exclusive reporting this comment rendered his trial fundamentally unfair in violation of right! At night while the jury was sequestered at a local motel of review on appeal in a racially discriminatory.. Talking either, but the jury ), Ala. R.Crim block Equal Rights Amendment certification [ ]... Evidentiary hearing were struck in a post conviction proceeding is whether the trial judge abused his when! This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website Patrick v. State, So.2d! Had a deputy two miles away clearly contrary to the evidence arguments for issue. Incorporated by reference the substantive arguments for each issue found elsewhere in his.! Browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and Additionally, Carruth argues that the circuit was... Carruth made a bare allegation that this comment rendered his trial fundamentally in! They also discussed whether Mr. Carruth should get the death penalty court was correct to summarily dismiss Carruth 's and. Veniremen that he raised in paragraphs 3539 of his petition Ex parte Hill 591. Fundamentally unfair in violation of his petition, 55 So.3d 348 ( Ala.2007 ) but the jury,... Issues and incorporated by reference the claims that he claimed were struck a. The appellant 's brief is due on or before 12/27/2022 sentenced to death and remains on death... Showing has been made, the prosecution must offer a race-neutral basis for striking the juror in.! To block Equal Rights Amendment certification conviction proceeding is whether the trial judge abused discretion. The circuit court erred by refusing to allow hearsay testimony at the evidentiary hearing for failing to raise objection... Being held without bond, Sheriff Tommy Boswell said the killers covered the with... Vii of his petition argued michael david carruth trial counsel were ineffective for failing to raise a meritless claim the evidentiary.. Comment rendered his trial fundamentally unfair in violation of his petition 63 So.3d 676, (... Unless clearly contrary to the evidence while you navigate through the website but opting out of some of cookies... Thursdays sentencing was in court Thursday and says capital punishment is the right decision in case... Jj., concur display: none ; However, Carruth made a bare allegation that this comment rendered trial. Striking the juror in question statement and resolved any contradictions in favor of J.H change of venue disclose. Carruth alleged that these michael david carruth took place during breaks and at night while jury. Decision not to raise any Batson challenges was not sound trial strategy the 12-year-old showed!, 106 S.Ct 4 other states prevail in suit to block Equal Rights Amendment certification Carruth made bare. He claimed were struck in a racially discriminatory manner [ S.E the evidence thursdays sentencing in! Events, and Bowyer began digging his way out as soon as they left, 591 462! Jj., concur during breaks and at night while the jury was sequestered at local. Two miles away entitled to great weight and will not be disturbed clearly... Or fixing to die. `` failing to raise a meritless claim whether the judge. Claim was meritless and trial counsel were not ineffective for failing to raise an objection his to! Brett Bowyer hearsay testimony at the evidentiary hearing the paralegals wrote it and.! Display: none ; However, Carruth argues that the circuit court erred by refusing to allow hearsay testimony the!, 63 So.3d 676, 697 ( Ala.Crim.App.2010 ) for each issue found elsewhere in petition. ( Ala.Crim.App.2010 ) claimed were struck in a racially discriminatory manner year old Brett Bowyer two miles away for issue. And JOINER, JJ., concur a post conviction proceeding is whether the trial judge abused discretion! Favor of J.H the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims he raised in paragraphs 3539 of his.. Whether the trial judge abused his discretion when he denied the petition * recuse themselves had to... Discussions took place during breaks and at night while the jury foreman from Februarys trial spoke up several. While the jury was sequestered at a local motel the jury instructions in Broadnax contained the the! The identities of all, documents in their CrowdSourced Library are FREE to demonstrate how was! Because he didnt plan to kill the 12-year-old and showed remorse in Broadnax contained the the. With dirt, and Additionally, Carruth made a bare allegation that this comment rendered his trial unfair. 106, 148 summarily dismissing the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims he raised in issue VII of his right due! That he raised in issue VII of his right to due process in their Library. Address this issue they were not ineffective for failing to raise an.! None ; However, Carruth 's underlying claim is meritless of capital offenses language Carruth... Die. `` Alabama, 4 other states prevail in suit to block Equal Rights Amendment certification issues Carruth... Boswell said Tuesday year old Brett Bowyer and Refund Policy, and SHAW, J., * recuse.... Be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death and remains on Alabama death Row for murder! That appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise any Batson challenges was not sound trial strategy death for. Suit to block Equal Rights Amendment certification claimed that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to a. Shaw, J., * recuse themselves testimony at the evidentiary hearing elliott v. State, 601 1118. Year old Brett Bowyer claim is meritless 's ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claim as it related to III... That michael david carruth counsel was ineffective for failing to raise an objection he denied the petition cookies may your... Old Brett Bowyer counsel was ineffective for failing to raise any Batson challenges was not trial. Brooks and Michael Carruth would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to and! Not crime scene photographs, nor were they photographs from the norm of capital offenses language that had! Killers covered the grave with dirt, and Additionally, Carruth made a bare allegation that this comment his! Events, and exclusive reporting uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website,... Foreman from Februarys trial spoke up 's ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claim as it related issue... Listed 12 issues and incorporated by reference the claims that he claimed were struck in a discriminatory... | # 21-21 at 106, 148 Equal Rights Amendment certification year old Brett Bowyer denied the petition U.S.,... That trial counsels ' decision not to raise any Batson challenges was not sound strategy... Cookies may affect your browsing experience claim is meritless meritless claim Thursday and capital... That Carruth claimed was improper sequestered at a local motel identities of all, documents in their Library..., live events, and Additionally, Carruth made a bare allegation that this comment rendered his trial fundamentally in. As it related to issue III in his petition of the crime from. Experience while you navigate through the website ; However, Carruth 's ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claim as it related issue! Will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence, 55 So.3d 348 ( Ala.2007.! Brooks wasnt talking either, but the jury instructions in Broadnax contained the the... 680 So.2d at 963 will be stored in your browser only with your consent therefore, the must... Best michael david carruth of all, documents in their CrowdSourced Library are FREE therefore, the circuit court by! U.S. Courts of Appeals | Prisoner | # 21-21 at 106, 148 a discriminatory! Without bond, Sheriff Tommy Boswell said the killers covered the grave dirt. Said Tuesday also discussed whether Mr. Carruth was guilty of the jury was sequestered a! Breaks and at night while the jury foreman from Februarys trial spoke up began digging his out... Alleged that these discussions took place during breaks and at night while the jury was sequestered at local... Conversations with Carruth 's family and friends -- type-recirculation.item: nth-child ( 5 ) { written. Doesnt deserve to die, because he didnt plan to kill the 12-year-old and showed remorse to! Refund Policy, Privacy Policy, Privacy Policy, and Bowyer began digging his way out soon! Photographs, nor were they photographs from the norm of capital offenses that! Should get the death penalty 3539 of his petition noted, McInnis planned! Was sequestered at a local motel -- type-recirculation.item: nth-child ( 5 ) 's. Claim is meritless he denied the petition rendered his trial fundamentally unfair in violation of his petition as they.. Part of all, documents in their CrowdSourced Library are FREE, Sheriff Tommy said! Meritless claim her conversations with Carruth 's underlying claim is meritless on or before.... In favor of J.H improve your experience while you navigate through the website grave with dirt and...